UC Davis Health Sciences Libraries
Proposed Liaison Program for the
Health Sciences Libraries
Introduction
The UC Davis Health Sciences Libraries propose to
establish a liaison program to serve targeted departments/divisions within the
Schools of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine.
The intent of the liaison program is to increase communication with and
improve services for the faculty, staff and students within these
departments/divisions by providing more customized, specialized, personal
services.
Pursuit of this program is intended to enhance
the position of the Health Sciences Libraries as a leader in the provision of
health sciences information and services.
The liaison program would foster increased visibility of the library and
credibility of participating librarians.
Benefits of the liaison program would include
improved communication with and service to targeted departments/divisions
within the Schools of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine. For example:
·
More
collaborative relationships between the Health Sciences Libraries and targeted
departments/divisions
·
Streamlined
channels of communication between the Health Sciences Libraries and targeted
departments/divisions
·
Instructional
activities customized to the specific needs of targeted departments/divisions
·
Improved
accessibility (time and location) of instructional activities and other
services
By working closely with a specific group of
faculty, staff and students, librarians can increase their understanding of
user needs and facilitate responses to those needs in a more user-centered
fashion.
Participating in the liaison program and
concentrating their efforts toward a specific group of faculty, staff and
students would provide the following benefits to librarians:
·
Increased
competence and confidence
·
Improved
rapport
·
Greater
proficiency in a specific group of resources
·
Greater
awareness of trends and programs
Proposal
The liaison program would
serve selected departments within the Schools of Medicine and Veterinary
Medicine, the primary clientele of the Health Sciences Libraries. The targeting of major departments would
allow individual librarians the flexibility to pursue liaison activities with
as many (or few) divisions within their departments as seems feasible within
workload constraints and faculty response.
My recommendation would be to initiate a
six-month pilot program possibly followed by an expanded program. A pilot program would provide the
flexibility to assess, plan and evaluate the following considerations before embarking on an
expanded program:
·
Success
of the program relative to the targeted departments/divisions
·
Impact
of the program on the workload of the liaison librarians
·
Effect
of the program on the functioning of other library departments (collection development,
access services and technical services)
Pilot Program : January 2003 – June 2003
·
I
: Monthly email to targeted departments/divisions announcing liaison program :
January – March
ü
Liaisons
responsible for email to individual departments/divisions
·
I/G : Design liaison web site including individual liaison web pages :
January – March
ü
Liaisons
responsible for designing individual web pages
·
I
: Begin researching needs and interests of targeted departments/divisions :
January – March
·
I
: Contact selected departments/divisions with regard to most essential services
: April – June
·
G
: Discuss liaison program during SORD meetings : monthly
ü
Plan
group activities
ü
Share
ideas, successes, difficulties
·
G
: Evaluate impact of pilot program on liaisons and library staff : June
ü
Should
liaison assignments be changed?
ü
Should
liaison services be changed?
ü
How
to further facilitate coordination of liaison program with other library
departments?
·
G
: Evaluate impact of pilot program on targeted departments/divisions : June
ü
Are
faculty, staff and students aware of liaison program?
Ø
Quantifiable
: Email survey
ü
Number
of instructional and other liaison activities?
Ø
Quantifiable
: Instructional database
ü
Number
of marketing and publicity activities?
Ø
Quantifiable
: Access database
ü
Number
of email messages?
Ø
Quantifiable
: Access database
Minimal activities for pilot program:
Expanded Program : July 2003 – ongoing
·
I
: Conduct increasingly personalized marketing and publicity
·
I
: Add more advanced features to web pages
·
I
: Conduct formal needs assessment of targeted departments/divisions
ü
Evaluate clinical and research
interests of faculty, staff and students
ü
Review catalogs, course
descriptions and newsletters
ü Meet with department/division chairs, library representatives
and other members of the department/division semiannually
ü Request that your name be added to the department/division email
list
ü Review publications, dissertations and professional appointments
of new faculty and graduate students
·
I/G : Develop new services to meet the specialized needs of targeted
departments/divisions
·
I
: Expand number of serviced departments/divisions : ongoing
·
G
: Discuss liaison program during SORD meetings : monthly
ü
Plan
group activities
ü
Share
ideas, successes, difficulties
·
G
: Evaluate impact of expanded program on liaisons and other library staff :
semiannually
ü
Should
liaison assignments be changed ?
ü
Should
liaison services be changed ?
ü
How
to further facilitate coordination of liaison program with other library
departments?
·
G
: Evaluate impact of expanded program on targeted departments/divisions:
semiannually
ü
Response
and level of faculty, staff and student satisfaction with various aspects of
the program?
Ø Quantifiable
: Focus groups
Ø
Quantifiable
: Email survey
Ø
Include
the five AAHSL questions in the LibQual+ survey
ü
Number
of instructional and other liaison activities?
Ø Quantifiable
: Instructional database
ü
Number
of marketing and publicity activities?
Ø
Quantifiable
: Access database
ü
Number
of email messages?
Ø
Quantifiable
: Access database
I = Individual responsibility
G = Group responsibility
Services
Proposed services to be performed under the
liaison program are similar to existing services. The major difference between existing and proposed services is
the strong emphasis on customizing the services to meet the specific needs of
targeted departments/divisions.
Hallmarks of the liaison program include intensive subject
specialization, concentrated knowledge of the needs, trends and politics of the
targeted departments/divisions, extensive communication with users, and
personal information services.
Existing services performed and
responsibilities assumed by reference librarians include:
·
Provide
reference service
·
Perform
instructional activities
ü
Library
Classes
ü
Visiting
Lectures for Credit Courses
ü
Consultations
ü
Library
Credit Courses
ü
Tours/Orientations
ü
Exhibits
·
Promote
library services & resources
ü
Develop
of web pages
ü
Participate
in campus events
ü
Participate
in joint activities with the School of Medicine, the School of Veterinary
Medicine and the UC Davis Health System
·
Maintain
a continuing awareness of trends and issues relating to instructional, patient
care, and research aspects of the health sciences environment and share that
information with colleagues
·
Share
in the review of health sciences resources to identify and recommend additions
to the collection
Proposed customized services to be performed
and responsibilities to be assumed by liaison librarians include:
ü
Distribute customized email
messages describing new library resources and services
ü
Tailor instructional programs to the
specific needs of the targeted departments/divisions
ü
Provide assistance to targeted
departments/divisions
ü Browse tables of
contents of subject-specific journals
ü Attend department-sponsored seminars
ü Audit campus courses
ü Attend meetings of professional societies
The goal of the liaison program is to
provide customized, subject-specific services to faculty, staff and students of
targeted departments/divisions in the Schools of Medicine and Veterinary
Medicine. Liaisons specialize in the
subject areas of their assigned departments, learning as much as possible about
the subject areas and their resources and databases as well as
departmental/divisional needs and trends.
Formal background in assigned subject
areas is not required for successful liaison services. Liaisons at other universities have
successfully developed their expertise by:
My recommendation would be to match four reference librarians to one (each) major department within the School of Medicine and the remaining three reference librarians to two (each) departments within the School of Veterinary Medicine. For example:
· Targeted departments for medical school faculty, residents & students – 4 liaisons
ü Terri (Obstetrics & Gynecology)
ü John (Pediatrics)
ü Rebecca (Surgery)
ü Judy (Internal Medicine)
ü
Jerry
(Medicine & Epidemiology)
ü
Ken
(Anatomy, Physiology & Cell Biology; Molecular Biosciences)
ü
Bernadette
(Population Health & Reproduction; Surgical & Radiological Sciences)
ü
Rebecca
(Pathology, Microbiology, & Immunology)
Cunningham-Stillion, Avril. “Liaison Program”. Dahlgren Memorial Library, Georgetown
University Medical Center. December 15,
2000
Tennant,
Michele R. et al. “Customizing for clients : developing a library liaison
program from need to plan.” Bulletin of
the Medical Library Association 89 (January 2001) 8-20.
Tennant,
Michele R. et al. “Development and Assessment of Specialized Liaison Librarian
Services: Clinical vs. Basic Science in a Veterinary Medicine Setting.” Medical Reference Services Quarterly
21 (Summer 2002): 21-37.
Public and internal documents shared by Peggy Sleeth, Associate Director/Information Resources, Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries.
“Reaching Out through a Library Liaison Program.” Poster. Claude Moore Health Sciences Library, University of Virginia.